Something happened last night that sort of threw me for a loop. I was at Isaac’s choir rehearsal, and as we parents sat around waiting while our kids practiced, we were asked to help fold and stuff the choir newsletter, to get it ready for mailing next week. As often happens during these “work” sessions, conversation happened. Now understand, as a group of parents we sometimes have little in common with each other, except that our kids happen to be involved in the same organization. Our personalities, backgrounds and philosophies are varied. I guess the situation is not unique to this particular setting, but in my experience, choirboy families tend to be a little more diverse and perhaps even eccentric than say, the parents of kids on a baseball team. After all, baseball is pretty much mainstream America – boys’ choir is not. So the conversation meandered a bit. One topic that is usually “safe” is anything related to the choir and all of the activities associated with it. For example, the weekend sleepover party the kids had last Friday/Saturday, or the upcoming fundraising concert, or summer camp, etc. Other less safe topics that were touched on last night were gay and transgender issues…perhaps you get the picture.
Most of the parents that stay at the choir building during rehearsal are moms. I don’t know why that is, but it has been true for all of the 8 years I have had kids involved in the organization. Moms are more likely to be the ones bringing the boys to rehearsal, and MUCH more likely to be the ones who stay and visit with each other. Of the 7 parents working on the newsletter last night, 6 of us were moms (or grandmoms) and only 1 was a dad. And let me tell you, this dad happens to be one of the quietest, most private (introverted?) people I know. I know his wife fairly well. We live in the same community (the choir draws kids from many area communities…probably a dozen of more towns in a 50-mile radius of the location of the choir building), she works in our school district, and we both spent a week last summer rooming and working together as volunteers at the choirboy summer camp. Even she admits her husband is an extremely quiet individual. So much so that at times it almost seems that he resents being included in a conversation. His answers to direct questions are short and to the point and do not invite further conversation. He is the most difficult person to get to know that I have ever encountered. I am not passing a judgment on him for this – I respect his desire for privacy. He is always willing to help with whatever job is at hand, but he does not generally participate in the idle conversation that ensues. That’s okay.
Here is what is not okay, though. At least, it made me very uncomfortable. Our quiet man made only two comments last night, both of them very defensive. The first one was predictable, because it came during the discussion of gay/transgender issues, which is a touchy and controversial topic to begin with. To converse on such a topic is to invite an argument. Quiet man (hereafter referred to as QM) objected to a rather stereotypical statement made by one of the moms, and probably rightly so. Stereotypes should never go unchallenged, in my opinion. It was rather unexpected that he would be the one to state the objection, however. And rather emphatically state it, at that. Okay – after a somewhat awkward moment that subject got dropped in favor of what one would assume to be a more innocuous one – piano lessons. Two of the staff from the choir – one a director and the other an accompanist — also give piano lessons. My son takes lessons from the director; one of the other moms has a son who takes lessons from the accompanist. We were discussing how our respective sons like their lessons, how we handle the practice time at home etc. I am not a great piano player, but at this point I can still handle the music assigned to Isaac. (This is his second year of lessons). I also can read music very well, and have a pretty firm grasp on music theory. All of this helps me to assist Isaac with his piano homework. At times I have wondered how parents who have no knowledge of piano playing, or music reading and theory, handle the piano lesson assignments. To me, it would be like trying to help my child learn to speak Chinese, when I have absolutely no knowledge or basis for understanding the language. How would I know if what he was practicing was being learned correctly? I wouldn’t. So for an entire week (assuming lessons were on a once a week basis, as piano lessons typically are) my child could be practicing and *learning* their lesson the wrong way! So I asked the other mom if she played piano. Her answer was “I took lessons”. Meaning – “yes, I understand how to play the piano but do not consider myself to be a piano player because I never achieved the proficiency needed to put myself in that category” (I am reading between the lines of what she said and making assumptions based on what *I* would mean if *I* made that statement). So I replied (this is pretty much word for word) “The reason I asked you if you played was because I have often wondered how *difficult* (emphasis on the word difficult) it must be for parents who don’t know how to play and can’t help with the lessons”. I was trying to express empathy for the difficulty of helping our kids learn things that we never learned (or at least never mastered) ourselves. QM rather quickly jumped on my statement by saying “Oh, it’s entirely possible. Lee does very well, and so does Katherine. Denise (his wife) and I don’t know how to play.” (He sounded mad when he said this). So I asked him “What happens if they are playing something the wrong way, how do you help them correct the mistake so they don’t learn it wrong?” And QM answered, “Well, that is between them and the teacher”. With that, he abruptly stood up and left the room (it was just about time to be done anyway) leaving me no opportunity to discuss the topic any further. I got the impression he was really upset with me – like I was suggesting that kids whose parents don’t play piano or don’t know music shouldn’t bother with lessons, or that I was somehow “superior” to him because I could help Isaac and he could not help his kids. In leaving (in a huff), he gave me no chance to correct that impression, because I CERTAINLY did not mean it that way! In fact, parents who give their kids the opportunity to learn new things, especially things they themselves never had a chance to learn (or perhaps never had the desire to learn), impress me. I commend parents who let their kids determine their own passions, rather than trying to live their own unfulfilled dreams through their offspring. Nevertheless, I think it must be hard when your kid’s areas of interest and passion lie outside your own realm of experience. I don’t just think this — I know it, because not all of my kids have passions that coincide with areas I am familiar with.
So – I am left asking myself two questions, well, maybe two and a corollary. First – did I actually offend QM, or am I just misreading him, because, let’s face it, he is not an easy guy to decipher! The corollary to this question is if I did indeed offend him, should I try to pursue the conversation further, to clarify my meaning, or should I just drop the whole thing. Like I said, he is not a man who invites conversation, and I am not a woman who enjoys confrontation. The second question is a broader question, not specific to this incident, but regarding society as a whole. Just why in the world are people so easily offended, and why do we all have to be so careful about what we say around each other? Can’t we all just CHILL out a little bit, and give each other the benefit of the doubt when it comes to perceived misunderstandings? I do not go around intentionally trying to offend other people – I’m sure very few of us do. So if in idle conversation someone says something that could be taken more than one way – one being offensive and the other not – can’t we all just make a pact to assume the non-offensive meaning and live in peace? After all – conversation happens!
Recent Comments